Three years ago, during the opening day of bear season I saw a black bear that was limping badly on three legs. The bear was holding his injured front leg up. The bear would hop more then walk. I passed up and didn't shoot this bear that day because he was an average size bear. I wanted to shoot a large four hundred pound boar seen on my trail cam photos. My hunting family and friends said I should do a mercy killing on that bear. The bear can't run or climb to escape danger so a huge bear could kill it. I already bagged three average size bears in the past and wanted a huge bear. What would you have done on that first day of bear season?
Top Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Three years ago, during the opening day of bear season I saw a black bear that was limping badly on three legs. The bear was holding his injured front leg up. The bear would hop more then walk. I passed up and didn't shoot this bear that day because
Collapse
X
-
That's such a tough call. I know animals can survive some pretty horrendous injuries. I would think a front leg would be better hurt than a back one too. I know that deer and bear are different, but I jumped a fawn that was missing a front leg one early fall at the farm I hunt. As it ran, it was stumbling pretty badly and I thought about dispatching it then but didn't. I played that decision over in my head for the rest of that year until I saw a mature doe missing a front leg in the same part of the timber the next fall. I have seen her now for the last three seasons and it's hard to tell that anything is wrong with her until you see the missing leg. Maybe that bear you passed has now become another 400 pound boar.
Comment
-
That's a tough call, and one I've had to make with deer a couple of times. For me it really depends on whether I think it has a chance of recovering. If I think it does, I will pass it, but if not, I would probably shoot it. But on the other hand, just to play Devil's Advocate, do we really need to be dispatching wild animals just because we think it would be "humane"? Nature by its very definition is not humane or merciful, so there is a legitimate argument to be made for letting things run their natural course in these cases. After all, wild predators and scavengers have to eat too. Not an easy decision, for sure.
Comment
-
I always thought the right answer was to take it, but I'm no longer so sure.
I mentioned to a neighbor a couple of months ago that I wondered how a particular old three legged doe in our neck of the woods did as tough as this past winter was. I had been keeping an eye out to take her down during archery the last two falls thinking that one difficult winter would be a starvation sentence for her.
The neighbor informed me that he hasn't seen her out and about, but had her on his game camera with triplets this spring.
I don't always know what I think I know.
Comment
Welcome!
Collapse
Welcome to Outdoor Life's Answers section. Here you will find hunting, fishing, and survival tips from the editors of Outdoor Life, as well as recommendations from readers like yourself.
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ for information on posting and navigating the forums.
And don't forget to check out the latest reviews on guns and outdoor gear on outdoorlife.com.
Right Rail 1 Ad
Collapse
Top Active Users
Collapse
There are no top active users.
Right Rail 2 Ad
Collapse
Latest Topics
Collapse
-
Hi Everyone just about to purchase some Binoculars for outdoor, hunting, birding etc.
Can anyone give any advice what size would be the best buy...-
Channel: Gear
Yesterday, 12:58 PM -
-
by shatikhatunTheir complaints into the subconscious of other buyers and marking their purchase decisions Others may say that such comments are unhelpful, but your...
-
Channel: Predator Hunting
05-10-2022, 03:43 AM -
Right Rail 3 Ad
Collapse
Footer Ad Widget
Collapse
Comment